|Title||Effective population size and the efficacy of selection on the X chromosomes of two closely related Drosophila species.|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2011|
|Authors||Andolfatto, P, Wong, KM, Bachtrog, D|
|Journal||Genome Biol Evol|
|Keywords||Animals, Codon, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Genes, X-Linked, Genetic Drift, Genetic Fitness, Male, Mutation, Polymorphism, Genetic, Population, Population Density, Selection, Genetic, X Chromosome|
The prevalence of natural selection relative to genetic drift is of central interest in evolutionary biology. Depending on the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations, the importance of these evolutionary forces may differ in species with different effective population sizes. Here, we survey population genetic variation at 105 orthologous X-linked protein coding regions in Drosophila melanogaster and its sister species D. simulans, two closely related species with distinct demographic histories. We observe significantly higher levels of polymorphism and evidence for stronger selection on codon usage bias in D. simulans, consistent with a larger historical effective population size on average for this species. Despite these differences, we estimate that <10% of newly arising nonsynonymous mutations have deleterious fitness effects in the nearly neutral range (i.e., -10 < N(e)s < 0) in both species. The inferred distributions of fitness effects and demographic models translate into surprisingly high estimates of the fraction of "adaptive" protein divergence in both species (∼ 85-90%). Despite evidence for different demographic histories, differences in population size have apparently played little role in the dynamics of protein evolution in these two species, and estimates of the adaptive fraction (α) of protein divergence in both species remain high even if we account for recent 10-fold growth. Furthermore, although several recent studies have noted strong signatures of recurrent adaptive protein evolution at genes involved in immunity, reproduction, sexual conflict, and intragenomic conflict, our finding of high levels of adaptive protein divergence at randomly chosen proteins (with respect to function) suggests that many other factors likely contribute to the adaptive protein divergence signature in Drosophila.
|Alternate Journal||Genome Biol Evol|